AboutHome

This site is now retired. It is only a static archive. Some functions may not work any more.

Real ITSM 1.2 Service Demand Review on Sep 2008 for Harry's Hot Autos by rob

Review submitted by rob on September 5, 2008 - 00:02. [nid:648]
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsvine
  • Rojo
  • Technorati
Benchmark: Real ITSM 1.2 Service Demand
RATS Reckoning: 50% from 16

Design for failure : Yes

Harry fails often

Delay new services: Yes

Harry does little

Divert new services to better fit IT requirements: No

Have formal SLAs and argue over SLAs on a regular basis with customers: No

Bonus: Use MS-Excel: No

Design for the lowest availability level that will be tolerated by the customer: Yes

Do not plan or rehearse for service discontinuities unless pressure from auditors becomes intolerable: Yes

Treat capacity planning and monitoring as pointless: Yes

Minimise security infrastructure investment except under threat of losing compliance or failing audit: Yes

Wait for service discontinuities and/or design services to ensure a suitable discontinuity within a reasonable timeframe: Yes

Bonus: Wait until after this happens: Yes

Perform occasional forensic security audits from within IT: No

Have a system to allocate vendor contacts: No

Bonus: Rotate contacts to share the value: No

Seek to be a reference site for all purchases: No

Encourage outsourcing in the appropriate situations: No

About the reviewer

Syndicate content